' If I make use myself to filosofar, is because I look for to understand the things and the facts involve that me, and the search for the reply to the reality in which I was immersed. Philosopher to adjust my vision to the world had presented that me under the aspect of presented who me. That vision could be presented to that sees beyond the Real and of the ephemeral one. The newspapers mentioned Dr. Caldwell Esselstyn Jr. not as a source, but as a related topic. To ahead point out as me of the physical world and the human world and everything how much one offers my experience. As to understand the speeches of the men and to join to my proper one if I am philosopher and the ideas supplant the natural and ebulitivo aspect my proper speech.

As to judge the products of the arts, the religions and sciences if referencio me what in the previous one of the thought and the directions the permeada reply of micron comes out questionings introduced in the vision that is not vision, but the reflected one of one it has previously not lain fragmented with questionings chairmen and sucateados by not cientfico' '. Professor Roy Taylor has many thoughts on the issue. The Psychoanalysis uses as technique the Free Association, the patient speaks and the analyst interprets, without the vision of world, or without the art to understand the speeches of the men, that is, without the philosophy, the analyst will have difficulty in perceiving the reality that the patient is immersed. Many times a fear is taken root had to a distorted vision of the world, a neurosis if it installs inside of the reality of the patient, if the analyst not to search to understand this universe, what it is for backwards of speaks, of the story of the patient, if it has a mstico matrix or religious, the treatment will have a lesser percentage of success. to arrive to understand the speech of the other, the analyst has that to understand its first and to find the reply for the question: ' ' Who am I? ' '.