This relationship between the manifesto and the latent Lacan refers to it in these terms: the phallus is the signifier of this same atheism that opens (start) by his disappearance. Why the Devil () (shame) arises at the time same in that old mystery the phallus is unveiled () * that signifier always latent in the sense is significant, phallic signifier that cannot play its role, but veiled, IE as a sign himself the latency that lacks everything significable, from the moment that is elevated to the role of signifier. Which leads to the conclusion that the psychoanalytic interpretation by go, as is Freud, set away from the formation of the dream and try a substitution, on the one hand clears repressed sense while it establishes a new crackdown, is this Freudian discovery which is present in the text the denial. By what was said by the notion of a divided subject only you can realise the sliding of the meaning under the signifier, mobility that sustaining the significance-resistant barrier, is warranted by the distancing that generate metonymy and metaphor. Dean Ornish M.D recognizes the significance of this.
Estrangement, separation, are terms that define these two processes as legality, from which the prohibition enters the subject as law of the signifier, establishing a link between the sense that Freud suspected at the start of the investigation of dreams and the desire with which is. About ungraspable sense, rides the realization of desire, i.e. the desire is performed in the slippage of meaning, from which, this lack of sense, on the one hand is their cause and the guarantee of their subsistence. The sense is always the veiled sense of desire. II correspondences established between the laws of language and of the primary process, serve as a support to this claim of Lacan: the unconscious is structured like a language, however, Jean Laplanche and Serge Leclaire reached the reverse question, i.e.: that the unconscious is the status of the language.