Tag: psychology

Psychoanalysis Interview

In Psychoanalysis, anamnese is not interview. Interview is a term reserved for some meeting of special type, does not stop regular contacts. It is treated, therefore of what one becomes before undertaking a psicanaltico treatment. Its purpose is in the way ampler than in anamnese, to decide if the person who consults must carry through a psicanaltico treatment or of another nature. Also in it a deep vision of the contraindications will be had. The interview is a facilitador factor where the interviewed one has the free expression of its mental processes. In the reality, this never obtains with the procedure of deed of division of questions and answers.

This does not discard the possibility to submit some questions or to ask for that the patient future speaks on something specific that it will facilitate in the future its analysis. We go to summarize some basic characteristics in the interview: 1.O field of the interview will be better if the participation of the interviewer will be minimum. 2.A strong dose of anxiety and/or anguish already in the interview is alg very common and must give (tax to YOU of ignorance); 3.O future analyzed has that to be informed on the purpose to answer to a consultation on its mental analysis and its problems, to see if it has necessity of accompaniment or treatment; 4.Em the interview we are always face the face moving away itself the use from the Div 5.A interview is not based on the rules of free Association, even so already if it initiates a species of assay of the same one; 6.O Psychoanalytic will be able to stimulate and until influencing with attitudes with not verbal attitudes, but with the physiology; 7.As notations of what it interests in the decision how much the analisibilidade, will have to be made of discrete, elegant and not acintoso form; 8.No if must interpret nor make, diagnosis during the interview. Its words must lead never to only and induce; 9.O Psychoanalytic does not have to appeal the procedures that prevent the anxiety, as the support or the suggestion. Neither to decide it with the specific instrument of the interpretation; 10.Em the end of each interview already predominates the will to come back, that it will be fortified in the course of analysis; 11.O time of the interview must be limited, as two, three or more sessions. Starting then the analysis properly said; 12.Deve to be distinct of the process of formal Psychoanalysis, thus the patient knows where she finished one and she started to another one; The interview informs on basic facts, not as analysis object, but as to define it will be or not possible the analysis work; 13.Em the interview, also the patient will be able to arrive at the conclusion of that this Psychoanalyst is not indicated to it, without, however to open hand of the treatment with another one. It is absolutely common, patient that they go to some analysts, in search of that satisfies its fancies a priori.

{ Comments are closed }

So Paulo

Saulo grew in the street. It attended a course only the first series, not obtaining to exceed this series due its difficulty of learning. In 2003? to the 8 years of age – the glue use initiated. Had to the envolvement with the glue and the experience of street, in 2007, to the 12 years, the father? dealer of drugs – it came to search it took and it for So Paulo, but it did not offer to the son no protection. Neglecter, beyond not offering mninas conditions of care, attention and affection, finished for stimulating the son to use crack.

Not supporting the conditions of maltreatment and violence which was submitted, Saulo was to live in the street. To the 14 years, it was found and received by a shelter. That in turn, taking care of to the apelos of Saulo to come back to live with the mother, it entered in contact with the Advice To tutor of Recife, directing it in return to this city. Since then, it continues to make use of drugs and practises small roberies and robberies. Currently, it is being threatened of death, which had to the robberies. It is not studying and it does not obtain to remain one week in house for more than, not to be that it is chained.

Form that the genitora found to protect it of these threats and of lives deeply of street. It is clearly that makes it for not obtaining to glimpse it alternative. As it does not obtain to convince the son through argument, the same one says that ' ' it prefers to chain it that to lose it for drogas' ' (sic). Petrini (2003), apud Gomes and Pereira (2004) affirms that to the measure that the family finds difficulties satisfactorily to fulfill to its basic tasks of socialization and support/services to its members, vulnerability situations are created.

{ Comments are closed }

The Patient

The world if modified in this time much more that in the previous centuries, and the moment is of reflection and new taken of position the problems of the health more they are aggravated with the said illnesses of the current civilization, and the technological advances had brought quantitative and qualitative changes in the form of if living and dying. In way to everything this, the constatao of that scientific knowing of the last centuries compromised our humanity while people human beings becoming necessary a new paradigm (including knowing scientific and the aspectossociais of the reality) to face the future realities. The challenges of the Biotica while to know that it joins specialists and laypeople, and of hospital Psychology while specialty to minimize the suffering of patients in a hospital context, pointing ways of ampler vision of the human being who we have and the world that we want. In this context Biotica and Psicologia they search to humanizar the hospital and to make possible to each patient a more active participation in relation proper itself, to its illness and also to its death. The patient is seen as subject of itself exactly, fomenting more horizontal quarrels with its 7 cuidadores, that also the interpersonal bonds are considered, sharing decisions and to know differentiated. A look more complex must be searched than the generalizante knowing of them bipartite for a possible free and tolerant conviviality with the differences. We look for to understand the process historical of each boarding stops conciliating in them of form not to repeat the errors already committed and to advance with more security in direction to the future. We know the difficult quo is the way of the dialogue and the search of consensus in questions that involve the life and the life, the death and dying, but valley to remember Lutzenmberg there when asked on why always it swam against the chain, what it answered: because thus one only arrives the springs.

{ Comments are closed }