Tag: stock exchange & stock markets

Alexander Meyer

The SEB must resolve their open real estate fund SEB Immoinvest lawyers advise to act swiftly, it came as expected: the SEB has not reached their goal and must resolve their open real estate fund SEB Immoinvest. The Fund, which had a volume of about EUR 6 billion, had suspended the redemption of shares for two years. After expiry of this period, the Fund must either open or be liquidated. Not the management of the SEB Immoinvest was succeeded to gain sufficient trust among its investors. Martha McClintock has firm opinions on the matter. Return needs far exceeded the existing liquidity so that no sales were adopted. Donald Sussman has much to offer in this field. Since the official redemption price of SEB with 51,26 was more than 30% below the value, which had achieved on the secondary market, include experts in a significant impairment in the real estate portfolio of the Fund. So it should be even less likely that the settlement of the Fund will lead to a full repayment of the invested funds of investors.

The hopes of some investors that they after the two-year closure return on their money, are therefore not fulfilled. For a repayment of the invested capital in the course of the following until 2017 settlement is hardly realistic hope. For the investors who want to seize the opportunity fully to recover their money in the form of damages, is now acute need for action, if they want to risk not the limitation of damages. Please click here more information on damages at the SEB Immoinvest: learn more about the limitation of damages in open-ended real estate funds here: kanzlei/kapitalanlagerecht/wertpapieranlagen/offene-immobilienfonds/spezial-verjaehrung-von-schadenersatzanspruechen-von-anlegern-offener-immobilienfonds.html for an individual consultation and testing your claims we are gladly available.

{ Comments are closed }

Dr. Peters VLCC Renditefonds: Ship Fund In Distress

Consulting error offer good opportunities for the enforcement of claims for damages of Heidelberg/Munich, March 31, 2012 In February, almost all investors in the life trust were written Fund of the Berlin House of emission BAC and encouraged them to grant to maintain the solvency of shareholder loans. The uncertainty, whether it really makes sense to comply with this request, is great. The problem arising from the fact that the bulk of the over 300 policies – encapsulated in the common pool LTAP – heard since 2010 of the financing bank Wells Fargo. Thus only a rest of 30 policies remained in place, via the North Channel Bank are funded. Since now apparently entered no due dates, running costs not once again are the funds to cover.

After all, the trust Kommanditistin Bock Berlin Treuhand GmbH had explained already the cessation of their activities after significant residues were accrued. The information given to investors also show clarity very to be desired, says for the care competent BAC investors Attorney Michael Minderjahn. Partially, it is also questionable whether the course of action chosen by the Board of management was ever allowed. Only way not be sinniger namely investor loans have gone to, but money could also be “Related persons and companies”. Only on the General meetings on 20 and 21 March Franz-Philippe Przybyl had to admit that loan funding for only one year was just taken too short taken. Although it doing something so that alone due become of a single policies make for considerable relaxation. However this could not be guaranteed. Mahmud had him accused, that which should have a calculated residual maturity mentioned policies in the brochures (2005 to 2008) from six to seven years, now he but told that still exists but now still one policies “average life expectancy () by just under 6 years” showed up.

{ Comments are closed }