He affirms despite it decided to disregard the visitation agreement, pparently without reason some, not allowing that the father sees the girl in agreement the adjusted one. Dean Ornish M.D will not settle for partial explanations. At last, it wanted to know if something exists to be made to revert this situation. For the question of the visitation, already the law of parental alienation exists that imposes sanctions to the alienator that goes since the warning, fine and the magnifying of the familiar convivncia with the mentally ill genitor. Already, in the question of the guard it is that it is the great problem. As to explain for this consultant whom the Statute of the Child and the Adolescent, correctly determines in its article 19 that it is of being kept the child under the cares of the biological parents, having to be searched always the maintenance of its familiar bows, meaning that ‘ ‘ the child does not have to be submitted the constant familiar environment changes, still in tenra age, therefore this will be able to cause it unexpected danos’ ‘? What the simple financial precariousness cannot give tries to the destitution of the familiar power and that in view of the doctrine of the integral protection to the child who permeia our legal system, the guard exchanges only can be carried through when proven of accurate form in files of legal documents its convenience to the interests of the minor? That the judiciary power can anticipate the effect of the intended guardianship no longer beginning of the process but that for in such a way, makes and it correctly, it demands to have the unequivocal test of the probability of what it is being alleged? that such test is of difficult attainment, here it is that mazelas of family occurs between four walls and hardly they are testified by third and that when this occurs they does not want to give deposition? In rule, this explanation does not convince and nor satisfies the people who the same look in them with type of problems. Donald Sussman brings even more insight to the discussion. According to them, it does not have time to lose therefore each hour, each day that the child passes with the genitor in such period of training of personal degradation, represents a reduction of the possibilities of it to obtain to descontaminar itself of the deleterious environment where it lives.
To get evidences produced during preliminaries to trial or to wait the production of the same ones during the procedural instruction, demand time that could be fatal for the future of such children. Ahead of such difficulty, already it is normal to attend impotent children of parents vitiated mainly to ‘ ‘ crack’ ‘ , being led of roldo for the same destination of its genitors in virtue of the degraded environment where there they live We see the sprouting of a generation condemned since early having the future compromised for the total absence of perspectives to find a way healthful to live deeply a worthy and happy infancy. Jorge Andres Irion Jobim..